<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does a Google Acquisition of Twitter Make Sense? Yes, Maybe&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crmoutsiders.com/2009/04/03/does-a-google-acquisition-of-twitter-make-sense-yes-maybe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crmoutsiders.com/2009/04/03/does-a-google-acquisition-of-twitter-make-sense-yes-maybe/</link>
	<description>Former analyst and journalist discuss CRM from the vendor-side</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 21:03:03 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Owan Hunte</title>
		<link>http://www.crmoutsiders.com/2009/04/03/does-a-google-acquisition-of-twitter-make-sense-yes-maybe/comment-page-1/#comment-1163</link>
		<dc:creator>Owan Hunte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 04:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crmoutsiders.com/?p=706#comment-1163</guid>
		<description>I have to agree Martin, Google did do the right thing in keeping YouTube a distinct brand and I&#039;m sure they would do the same with Twitter (at least for a good while). Google has proven themselves to be a company that understands how users browse and interface with the web so I&#039;m sure they will do their due diligence and execute careful planning in incorporating an app like twitter into their line of products and services. For now, we&#039;ll just have to watch this one and see where this leads.

Personally, I think that Twitter should do what is in their best interest. For a start-up they exploded onto the mainstream and have experienced a phenomenal growth in usage and popularity in such a short time. Also, as stated on the &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.twitter.com/2009/04/sometimes-we-talk.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Twitter blog&lt;/a&gt;, &quot;... Our goal is to build a profitable, independent company and we&#039;re just getting started.&quot; I guess the real crunch question that could make or break this Google/Twitter deal would be &quot;Would the merger/buyout be beneficial to Twitter achieving it&#039;s short-term and long-term business goals and objectives or would it more than likely result in the opposite&quot;?

As I said, we&#039;ll just have to wait and see what the outcome will be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree Martin, Google did do the right thing in keeping YouTube a distinct brand and I&#8217;m sure they would do the same with Twitter (at least for a good while). Google has proven themselves to be a company that understands how users browse and interface with the web so I&#8217;m sure they will do their due diligence and execute careful planning in incorporating an app like twitter into their line of products and services. For now, we&#8217;ll just have to watch this one and see where this leads.</p>
<p>Personally, I think that Twitter should do what is in their best interest. For a start-up they exploded onto the mainstream and have experienced a phenomenal growth in usage and popularity in such a short time. Also, as stated on the <a href="http://blog.twitter.com/2009/04/sometimes-we-talk.html" rel="nofollow">Twitter blog</a>, &#8220;&#8230; Our goal is to build a profitable, independent company and we&#8217;re just getting started.&#8221; I guess the real crunch question that could make or break this Google/Twitter deal would be &#8220;Would the merger/buyout be beneficial to Twitter achieving it&#8217;s short-term and long-term business goals and objectives or would it more than likely result in the opposite&#8221;?</p>
<p>As I said, we&#8217;ll just have to wait and see what the outcome will be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
